Skip to content
German expectations, local practice: five count misunderstandings

· Practice in Uzbekistan · 4 min read

German expectations, local practice: five count misunderstandings

Head office expects a traceable count record, the warehouse delivers a list. Five typical misunderstandings between Germany and Uzbekistan, and how to resolve them.

Head office in Germany expects a traceable inventory record, the warehouse in Uzbekistan delivers a signed list, and both sides consider their result complete. This is rarely ill will. It is two well-established ways of working that rub against each other in five places. Anyone who knows these places can raise them before the count instead of arguing about them afterwards. The overview below is deliberately general: every company is different, and not every warehouse behaves as described here.

Five typical misunderstandings

1. The sheet already contains the book stock

In German practice counting is often done blind: the count sheet names the item and the bin location but not the target quantity. On site, sheets with a pre-printed book quantity are not uncommon, which the team merely confirms. The count then often continues until the figure fits, and wrong postings go undetected.

2. Whoever manages the goods counts them

The warehouse manager knows the goods best, so he or she counts them. Head office expects independence instead: whoever keeps the stock record should not be the only one to check it. The answer is not exclusion but division of labour. Warehouse staff open up areas, give information and translate; others do the counting.

3. The cut-off date means "roughly this day"

The warehouse works until the evening and documents are posted in the days that follow. Head office thinks in terms of a fixed cut-off time with date and hour: everything that happens afterwards is recorded separately. Without a document cut-off it is later impossible to say whether a difference comes from the count or from a posting.

4. One signature under the final list is enough

On site the end product is often a summarised list with the signatures of the commission. An auditor in Germany wants to be able to see in addition who counted where and when, and how first and second count fit together. The individual count sheets therefore belong numbered in the file, not in the wastepaper bin.

5. A difference is a question of blame

In some companies any shortfall is first seen as a matter of personal responsibility. The consequence: differences are evened out, moved or not reported at all. Head office asks instead for the cause and the process behind it. Questions of liability are separate and are to be settled with HR and legal advice.

Why both sides have good reasons

The local way of working is not worse; it serves different aims. A commission with a final list often fulfils what local accounting expects, and people who know the goods count quickly. The German way of working serves proof to third parties: group accounts, auditor, controlling. Both aims can be combined if the existing structure serves as the frame and the German elements are added: independent second count, numbered sheets, a fixed cut-off time. The result is not a double stock count but one count that both sides can use.

One page of agreements

Record how both sides handle the five points:

  • The first count is made on sheets without target quantity; the book stock is read against it only at evaluation.
  • Counting is done by persons who do not manage the stock themselves.
  • The cut-off time with date and hour is in the count instructions, and movements after it are filed separately.
  • All count sheets are numbered, scanned and kept together with the record.
  • Differences first get a cause or a clearing status, not a culprit.

A fictional example on deadlines: head office asks for the cleared result twelve calendar days after the cut-off date of 31 December. Two weekends and New Year's Day take up to five of those days, which leaves seven to eight working days depending on the calendar. Evaluation, recounts and clearing must all fit into that time. Whether that is enough should be worked out before the count, not after.

In short

The gap between German expectations and local practice can be bridged once it is named. AuditMaster works from written count instructions, uses count teams that do not manage the stock, and delivers documents that can be traced back to the individual count sheet.